As expected with most disaster flicks, this film was typically all spectacle and barely any substance. Or did any hold it aloft after all?

Moana sailed its way into many Disney fans’ hearts and thus bore this sequel. Does it boldly go where the last film never sailed before?

It’s seen as a cult classic that tried to preach the values of reading. Sadly, it went through some stumbles, but it ain’t on the animation.

After 28 years, this followup to the 1996 disaster classic emerged. I felt it. I chased it. It didn't stun or suck. It sucked me in instead.

Emerging as the disaster film craze picked up steam in the mid-90s, is there more here besides stunning sound and visuals that blew me away?